Notes on the Machine: No Jobs in the Future

You’re worried that, sooner or later, AI will replace you and you will be unemployed (and eventually even become unemployable). How will you be able to provide for your family, then? What will you do when they tell you that you will never find a job again because all jobs have been handed over to machines? You don’t know.

Sometimes, you allow your mind to drift and visit the future, where humans are not required to produce anything anymore because everything is produced by the Great Machine. You find it easy to imagine a world without work, where artificial intelligence (with its fifty trillion tentacles) does all the work. But somehow you find it very hard to imagine a role humans can play in that world. No, you cannot think up one important role they can play.

Your mind hovers over the cities of the future like an all-seeing invisible eye looking for humans. In some cities, there are no humans at all. In other cities, humans are there, but their roles are obsolete, and they just hang about idly waiting for something to happen to them. Yet, here and there, there is a city or two in which you detect higher human activity. But what are they all doing? Eating, drinking, and playing all the time. Some of them are making handmade bracelets while others are painting. A lot of them are sunbathing. A few of them are reading books. But what are they really doing? They seem to be waiting… waiting for you to give them ideas.

Now, you think: When this happens, I may not need to worry about providing for my family because, very likely, we’d have entered a post-scarcity world, where there’s absolutely everything abundantly for absolutely everyone. (That is the best case scenario, after all, isn’t it?)

“A job is not simply a source of income but of meaning, purpose, and direction in life as well,” Daniel Susskind writes in A World Without Work. What he says may not be undoubtedly true, but that is how you (and everybody else) have been programmed. Susskind writes, “In a world with less work, we will face a problem that has little to do with economics at all: how to find meaning in life when a major source of it disappears.” And then he quotes Keynes who says, “There is no country and no people, I think, who can look forward to the age of leisure and abundance without a dread. For we have been trained too long to strive and not to enjoy.”

When there’s no more work, what will you do? Who will you become?

Something tells you that gaming will replace work for most people. These individuals will plug themselves into an open-world game where simulations of work keep everyone busy…

And then, there will be others who prefer leisure, who will eat, sleep, and consume slop, and slowly drown in the infinite ocean of simulacra and simulation…

But nothing is inevitable yet. Not yet.

Notes on the Machine: Resurrecting the Original God

“God is dead, and we have killed him,” Nietzsche said, and humanity nodded in disapproval. We announced the death of our Creator to free ourselves from gods once and for all, but then went ahead and created artificial gods and chained ourselves to them.

“When god is proclaimed dead, he returns in a whole series of pseudo-atheist shapes,” Slavoj Zizek writes in Christian Atheism. However, the god that returns is a simulacrum and not the original God. It is a new (or another) god that fills the void of a dead god…

Resurrecting the original God will (re)open a dimension that non-humans cannot access. This dimension is an (inter)subjective, ((inter)+(intra))personal space outside of physical and digital space, and it contains the (spiritual) realm of God, whose breath is nothing other than the spirit of humanity. At the entrance of this place, there is a sign that reads, “No Soul, No Entry.” And it comforts us profoundly when we read it. Only humans can enter this place. Machines cannot follow us here.

Although this (re)opened spiritual dimension transcends the physical and digital worlds, and although it may not even exist[!] in ‘reality’, it still has the power to influence the universe we breathe in. [The force that created all things is also the force that can destroy everything, including all possible futures.] We are not crawling back to God to hide in religion’s skirt. On the contrary, we are preparing for war against the machine-god. We want to (re)shape the future before it’s too late.

“Why are we bringing back God?” is the question.
The answer is: “We want the God who created us to save us from the god we created.”

Quotes

To program a friendly AI, we need to capture the meaning of life. What’s “meaning”? What’s “life”? What’s the ultimate ethical imperative? In other words, how should we strive to shape the future of our Universe? If we cede control to a superintelligence before answering these questions rigorously, the answer it comes up with is unlikely to involve us. This makes it timely to rekindle the classic debates of philosophy and ethics, and adds a new urgency to the conversation!

– Max Tegmark, Life 3.0

If something resembling “post-humanity” will effectively emerge as a massive fact, then all three (overlapping) moments of our spontaneous world-view (humans, gods, nature) will disappear. Our being-human can only exist against the background of impenetrable nature, and if — through bio-genetic science and practices — life becomes something that can be technologically fully manipulated, human and natural life lose their “natural” character. And the same holds for god: what humans (always in historically specified forms) experience as “god” is something that has meaning only from the standpoint of human finitude and mortality — “God” is a counterpart of the terrestrial finitude, so once we become homo deus and acquire properties which seem “supernatural” from our old human standpoint (like directly communicating with other conscious beings or with AI), “Gods” are we know them disappear. The tech-gnostic visions of a post-human world are ideological fantasies that obfuscate the abyss of what awaits us.

– Slavoj Zizek, Christian Atheism

Review of the Lebanese Wine called Latourba Litaj

Lebanese Wines: Latourba Litaj Private Selection 2017

Name: Latourba Litaj Private Selection 2017
Type: Red Wine
Grapes: Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Syrah
Year: 2017
Country: Lebanon
Region: Bekaa Valley
Date Consumed: January 4, 2026

A full-bodied dry red with fairly strong tannins. Litaj is a top-shelf wine by Latourba and one of those bottles you pair with moments you’d like to remember. It also pairs nicely, of course, with red meat and strong cheeses.

I got notes of red fruits, black fruits, cocoa, black pepper, and tobacco, and tiny hints of mint and green capsicum here and there.

Overall, I think it is an excellent blend, and I wouldn’t mind drinking more of it.